Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  John Raub responded

    Let me know if this is still of concern. We haven’t had this reported by other users, but it could be an issue. Thanks! John.

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  John Raub responded

    Let us know if there is still a desire for this feature. One of the issues is we still have to pull across all the data submitted from the SIS prior to validation. This could include other LEAs and therefore the queue line for validations exist. We did cut down on the number of validation jobs in a cycle by only triggering a single year of validations when you Queue Validation from the Validation Message page (it used to do all active years).

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base