Laura Braatz
My feedback
8 results found
-
4 votes
-
6 votes
-
10 votes
Let me know if you think a new L2 would still be useful. This could be based on primary enrollment spanning Oct 1 and the presence of an SSEPA SPED record spanning that same period and Child Count for Oct 1 = false. It could be false for a variety of reasons but those are clear within the Student Detail.
-
10 votesLaura Braatz supported this idea ·
-
18 votesunder review · AdminJoshua Roy (Product Owner, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction) responded
We do prompt for an Optional message during the Denial on the screen. We will poll users if we should require comment.
Laura Braatz supported this idea · -
19 votes
-
52 votes
Thanks to everyone on the feedback on this. We are discussing.. A lot of this is policy change more than tech, so I’ll have to await internal decision. Depending on decision, we would have to adjust the L2 validation etc. Thanks again for all the great input on this one. John.
Laura Braatz supported this idea · -
43 votes
This is a great concept. Not sure how we would execute, but I see the need for it. We’ll think about some options from a tech standpoint. Thanks.